Teradyne's robotics arm grows 33% to $100 million as AI test demand doubles group revenue
Teradyne reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $1,329 million, up 104% from a year earlier, with its Robotics group, home to Universal Robots and MiR, contributing $100 million against $75 million in the second quarter of 2025. The company guided third-quarter revenue to $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion.
Teradyne's Robotics group, which owns cobot maker Universal Robots and mobile robot maker MiR, posted second-quarter 2026 revenue of $100 million, the company said on July 28, 2026. That compares with $75 million in the same quarter of 2025, an increase of about 33%, and comes as artificial intelligence demand more than doubled the revenue of Teradyne as a whole.
Group revenue reached $1,329 million, up 104% from $651.8 million a year earlier. Semiconductor Test contributed $1,122 million, Product Test $107 million and Robotics $100 million. Net income attributable to Teradyne was $374.5 million, or $2.38 per diluted share under GAAP and $2.47 on a non-GAAP basis. Gross profit margin was 59.8%.
For the third quarter, Teradyne guided revenue to between $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, GAAP earnings to $1.79 to $2.09 per diluted share and non-GAAP earnings to $1.85 to $2.15. The company did not give a separate outlook for Robotics in the release.
Chief Executive Greg Smith said the strategy of capturing test and robotics opportunities from wafer to AI data center had produced another record quarter. He tied the guidance to AI-related demand and to a rapid increase in wafer fabrication equipment investment.
The robotics result matters because the unit has been through a difficult stretch. Teradyne's own filings note that a Robotics restructuring in the first quarter of 2025 affected about 150 employees. A year later, quarterly Robotics revenue is about a third higher, a sign that the cuts were followed by demand recovery rather than further retrenchment.
Even so, Robotics is a shrinking share of Teradyne. It accounted for about 7.5% of revenue in the second quarter of 2026, down from about 11.5% a year earlier, because test equipment for AI chips grew far faster. For investors who once valued Teradyne partly as a robotics play, the company is now overwhelmingly an AI test supplier with a robotics option attached.
Universal Robots sells collaborative arms that can work beside people without fencing in many applications, used for machine tending, palletizing and assembly. MiR builds autonomous mobile robots that move carts and pallets inside factories and warehouses. Teradyne describes the combined offering as collaborative and mobile robots supporting manufacturing and warehouse operations for companies of all sizes.
Against listed peers, Teradyne Robotics is the smallest of four automation suppliers that reported in the summer. Symbotic posted fiscal third-quarter revenue of $720.8 million on August 5, AutoStore $192.1 million on August 13, and KION Group's Intelligent Automation Solutions segment EUR 861 million on July 30. Teradyne's 33% growth sits between KION's 23% and AutoStore's 43.4%.
For the global cobot market, the quarter suggests that spending on small industrial automation is improving, at least for Universal Robots. Smith's framing of robotics within an AI data center story also signals where Teradyne sees demand: automated handling in electronics and server assembly as well as traditional factory work.
The open question is profitability. The release does not break out Robotics operating profit, so it is not possible to tell from the numbers whether the 33% growth came with margin expansion. Pricing pressure from Asian cobot makers remains a structural risk for Universal Robots.
The next data point is the third-quarter report, due in late October 2026, which will show whether Robotics holds the $100 million level.
- Teradyne Robotics
- Q2 2026
- 100
- USD
- 33.3
- No data
- Symbotic
- FQ3 2026 (to Jun 27)
- 720.8
- USD
- 22
- No data
- AutoStore
- Q2 2026
- 192.1
- USD
- 43.4
- 217.6
- KION Intelligent Automation Solutions
- Q2 2026
- 861
- EUR
- 23
- 873
Figures as reported by each company. Teradyne Robotics growth computed as Q2 2026 $100m / Q2 2025 $75m minus 1. Order intake null where not disclosed. Currencies not converted.
As of Oct 1, 2026
ROBOTNESS analysis
Teradyne Robotics has recovered to a $100 million quarter, but inside a company now driven by AI test, its strategic weight is falling even as it grows.
The evidence is the mix shift. Robotics grew about 33% while the group grew 104%, so its share of revenue fell from about 11.5% to about 7.5%. Management's language tied robotics to AI data center buildout, which positions the unit as a supporting business rather than a separate growth engine.
The strongest counter-argument is that a recovering cobot leader growing a third a year is valuable on its own, and that a smaller share of a much larger Teradyne still means a well-funded parent able to invest through the cycle.
Bull case. Universal Robots and MiR keep growing above 30%, AI and electronics assembly create a new vertical for cobots, and Robotics returns to profit. Teradyne gains the option to spin off or list the unit at a growth multiple.
Bear case. Growth reverts once easy comparisons fade, Asian cobot makers pressure prices, and Teradyne's attention follows the far larger test business. Robotics drifts as a non-core asset.
Signals to watch:
- Q3 2026 Robotics revenue in Teradyne's late-October report, against $100 million in Q2
- Any disclosure of Robotics operating profit or loss in the 10-Q
- Strategic commentary on Robotics at Teradyne's next investor event
- July 28, 2026
- $2.38 (non-GAAP $2.47)
- $107 million
- $1,329 million, up 104%
- about 33% year on year
- Revenue $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion
- $100 million (Q2 2025: $75 million)
- $1,122 million
- about 7.5% (Q2 2025: about 11.5%)
Why it matters
Universal Robots is one of the most widely used cobot brands, and Teradyne's Robotics revenue is one of few public, quarterly reads on the cobot and AMR market. A 33% rise to $100 million suggests that buyers of small industrial automation are spending again.
The quarter also changes the investment case for Teradyne itself. With Robotics at about 7.5% of revenue, the stock trades on AI test, and robotics performance has little effect on the group's results.
Rival analysis
Teradyne Robotics competes in cobots with makers such as FANUC's collaborative line and Doosan Robotics, and in AMRs with a large field of warehouse robot companies. Among listed automation peers that reported this summer, it is the smallest by quarterly revenue.
Its strength is the installed base and partner network of Universal Robots; its weakness is that it sells mostly through integrators and lacks the system-level customer lock-in Symbotic enjoys with Walmart.
Valuation context
Robotics revenue of $100 million equals about 13.9% of Symbotic's quarterly revenue and about 52.1% of AutoStore's (ratio = Teradyne Robotics revenue / peer quarterly revenue). Robotics share of Teradyne revenue fell from about 11.5% (75/652) to about 7.5% (100/1,329).
Without disclosed segment profit, any separate valuation of the unit rests on revenue multiples alone.
Supply-chain implications
Cobot arms depend on compact servo motors, precision reducers and joint encoders, many sourced from Japan, Europe and China. MiR's mobile robots depend on lidar and safety scanners and battery packs.
Teradyne's scale in test equipment gives Robotics access to a strong balance sheet and procurement, but the unit competes on price against vertically integrated Asian makers.
Signals to watch
Third-quarter Robotics revenue in late October will show whether $100 million is a new run rate. The 10-Q may show segment profit or loss.
Watch also for any change in how Teradyne describes Robotics, especially wording that hints at partnership, separation or divestment.
Analyst view
Thesis: Robotics has recovered but is becoming strategically peripheral within Teradyne. Confidence: medium. Revenue figures come from Teradyne's release; segment profitability is not disclosed there, which limits judgment on the quality of growth.
We would read a second consecutive $100 million quarter as confirmation of recovery, and any restructuring language as a sign that the AI test business is absorbing management focus.
Questions you should be asking
Is the Robotics group profitable at $100 million a quarter?
How much of Robotics growth comes from electronics and AI server assembly versus traditional manufacturing?
Does Teradyne see Robotics as core over the long term, or as an asset that could be separated?
